By Jill R. Johnson

This is the third in a three-part series. The first part is here and the second here.

Construction companies that routinely protect themselves from expensive, protracted litigation by including in contracts mandatory arbitration of disputes may be puzzled over whether to include a new, optional clause in contracts that allows for appeal of an arbitrator's decision. After all, isn't the point of arbitration to achieve a quick and final resolution? In November 2013, the American Arbitration Association and International Centre for Dispute Resolution adopted new rules that allow appeals of awards, provided that both sides agree to this provision in advance. The Federal Arbitration Act allows appeals of arbitration decisions to the courts in only limited circumstances related to fraud or misconduct, but the AAA rules provide for appeals to a three-member tribunal of neutrals on the much broader grounds of errors in applying the law or determining facts. The question, then, is what are the benefits and drawbacks to agreeing to be bound by optional AAA rules that allow appeal?

Potential benefits

In complex cases, there is a greater likelihood of a single arbitrator making a mistake in applying the law or overlooking key facts. An appeal not only provides the opportunity to review these mistakes, but also places the matter into the hands of three neutrals with significant appellate experience. (The AAA rules require the tribunal to be comprised of judges or other neutrals with substantial appellate experience.) In effect, the appeals option creates a middle ground between the potentially enormous costs and time involved in a court system appeal versus the near-absolute finality of a non-appealable arbitration decision.

Potential drawbacks

The drawbacks are the additional investments of time and money, which run counter to one of the basic reasons that parties opt for arbitration. Even if a decision is not appealed, including it as an option makes it necessary to create a record of the initial arbitration. That usually will involve retaining a court reporter, and perhaps additional investments in presentation technology. If there is an appeal, parties essentially are paying for a second arbitration. Although there won't be oral arguments, there is the cost of paying three neutrals, administration, compiling the record and attorney time. It also should be noted that cases are not remanded. The tribunal will confirm the original award or modify it up or down. Thus, the outcome of an appeal will not be the opportunity to "retry" the case. Given these considerations, construction professionals should carefully assess whether the complexity and financial magnitude of their dispute merits the "insurance" of an appeals option.

Jill R. Johnson is a commercial litigator with Chamberlain Hrdlicka (Atlanta), who counsels clients with construction and related disputes. She may be reached at (404) 588-3574 or jill.johnson@chamberlainlaw.com. Have an idea for a guest blog for Construction Today? Contact alan.dorich@phoenixmediacorp.com or jim.harris@phoenixmediacorp.com.  

By Jill R. Johnson

This is the second in a three-part series.Find part one here.

Businesses in construction continue to review how game-changing rules in arbitration will affect them. In November 2013, the American Arbitration Association (AAA) and the International Centre for Dispute Resolution adopted new rules that potentially remove the finality of initial arbitration decisions. Called the Optional Appellate Arbitration Rules, decisions reached under contracts that include this clause can be overturned on review by an AAA appellate panel of three neutrals. Grounds for overturning a decision include situations involving alleged “material and prejudicial” errors of law and/or “clearly erroneous” determinations of fact. The application of the new rules is optional, and must be agreed to by all parties (typically in a contract). Parties should, therefore, carefully review any arbitration provisions in their contracts to determine whether they contain an agreement to permit the appeal of an award. The new rules also make keeping a record of arbitration proceedings almost essential in order to properly document an appeal.

While this might seem like it makes arbitration more like a conventional appellate court process, there are important differences and the process is extremely efficient compared to the courts. To initiate an appeal, the appellant must file a Notice of Appeal within 30 days from the date the underlying award is submitted to the parties. One of the next steps is to select an appellate tribunal of three neutrals from an AAA-approved list of former judges or other neutrals with substantial appellate experience. There also are certain filing requirements, including payment of a non-refundable $6,000 deposit required by the appellant. Within one week of selecting the tribunal, the parties, case manager and tribunal must schedule a preliminary conference “to review and formalize the briefing schedule, set a deadline for the submission of the record on appeal and address any other procedural issues consistent with these rules and the objectives for an expedited, cost effective and just appellate process,” according to the AAA rules. There usually is no oral argument or hearing, meaning that the appeal will be determined by the documents presented to the tribunal.

The entire appeal, from the Notice of Appeal to the issuance of a decision, is designed to be completed within approximately three months, with the tribunal’s decision due within 30 days of the parties’ last written submission. This abbreviated schedule makes an arbitration inexpensive compared to a court appeal, but it is not without costs. In addition to the filing costs, the client will still have to pay additional fees for the neutrals, AAA administration and attorneys. There also is the cost of keeping a record of the original arbitration. Once the appellate tribunal renders its decision, that decision becomes the final award for purposes of judicial enforcement proceedings. Unlike a court appeal, the arbitration tribunal cannot remand a case to the original neutral. The tribunal can only confirm the original award or substitute a new, final award. The decision is final, with no appeal to a higher tribunal or any entity outside the arbitration process. Thus, it is a one-step appeal process with the certainty of being resolved by the appellate tribunal.

Jill R. Johnson is a commercial litigator with Chamberlain Hrdlicka (Atlanta), who counsels clients with construction and related disputes. She may be reached at (404) 588-3574 or jill.johnson@chamberlainlaw.com.

Have an idea for a guest blog for Construction Today? Contact alan.dorich@phoenixmediacorp.com or jim.harris@phoenixmediacorp.com.

By Jill R. Johnson

This is the first of a three-part series.

Arbitration is a popular form of dispute resolution in the construction industry and many standard contracts require its use in lieu of litigation. However, in November 2013, the American Arbitration Association (AAA) and the International Centre for Dispute Resolution adopted the Optional Appellate Arbitration Rules, which permit parties – by advance mutual agreement, usually in a contract – to obtain appellate review of arbitration awards. Simply put, these new rules dilute the finality of arbitration, which is what makes the process so appealing. An arbitration award typically can only be set aside under extremely narrow circumstances involving corruption, fraud or misconduct, or where the arbitrators exceeded their powers. But now, under the new rules, review of arbitration awards is permitted by an AAA appellate panel in situations involving alleged “material and prejudicial” errors of law and/or “clearly erroneous” determinations of fact. In other words, the door swings open wider when it comes to questioning the outcome of the arbitration. In the construction setting, this is particularly concerning.

Arbitrators in construction disputes are not necessarily judges or legal professionals (although they can be), and they sometimes get the law wrong, misapply the law to the facts or commit any other number of errors that impact the outcome of the proceeding. For example, if an arbitrator mistakenly upheld a “pay if paid” clause in violation of a state law that says that these types of conditional payment clauses are unenforceable, until the enactment of these new rules a party negatively affected by this mistake had no recourse other than to ask a court to vacate the award. With the new rules, however, the ability to appeal these types of issues is more clearly defined. To one extent, then, the new rules can be viewed favorably, because they provide an additional avenue of review outside of the extremely narrow grounds previously available under the law. The new rules certainly will be helpful to a party who has been the victim of a mistake of law or fact by an arbitrator.

The right to seek appellate review of both questions of law and issues of fact also could make arbitration more appealing to parties who may have sought to avoid the process in the past because of the complexity of their disputes or wariness of relying on a single arbitrator. On the other hand, an appeal adds an element of uncertainty into the arbitration process. With the availability of appellate review, there will be also be potential additional costs and time that have to be factored into resolving disputes. Everyone who enters into a construction contract should be aware of the option to include these new rules and should consult with counsel on whether to include them.

Jill R. Johnson is a commercial litigator with Chamberlain Hrdlicka (Atlanta), who counsels clients with construction and related disputes. She may be reached at (404) 588-3574 or jill.johnson@chamberlainlaw.com.

Have an idea for a guest blog for Construction Today? Contact alan.dorich@phoenixmediacorp.com or jim.harris@phoenixmediacorp.com.  

By Ray Rodriguez

Building a new home is as American as the American dream itself. And despite the floundering economy, demand for new home construction remains higher than ever. Now is the time for builders to capitalize on the recovery of the housing market and forge strong relationships with industry experts. Here are a few key reasons why you should establish a relationship with your local mortgage loan officer (MLO):

  1. Diverse Financing Options – Financing is a critical part of the home-buying process, and MLOs can provide a wealth of knowledge on loan options. Most regional MLOs offer robust product suites to meet a variety of financial situations.
  2. Educational Resource – MLOs provide expertise through every step of the mortgage process – from obtaining a pre-qualification letter to "live loan" status updates and submitting loan paperwork to the final sale. They understand the many moving parts of a loan and can calculate the options. Find an MLO that will determine the best option for your buyer.
  3. Discounts and Benefits for Banking Customers Chances are, if your buyers are banking at a local institution, they will qualify for an added discount or incentive applied over the life of the mortgage loan. While incentives add value to the ordinary banking relationship, the ability to enter a familiar neighborhood store and begin the mortgage process is invaluable. It makes the buyer feel more comfortable with the process.
  4. Ongoing Communication – A good working relationship between an MLO and builder is built on trust, reliability and communication. The best MLOs notify you and the buyer immediately when they require additional clarification or documentation. Experienced MLOs understand that timely communication keeps the process moving forward. All of these factors help build a stronger reputation for the builder and improve a client's home-buying experience.

Of course, finding the right MLO is critical. Not every bank or MLO will have what you or your buyers need. Get to know the MLOs in your area, so you can give your buyers more options. When speaking with MLOs, evaluate response time, follow-through and accessibility, since these factors are important to a successful partnership. In the end, you will discover knowledgeable, committed and dependable professionals who can become partners in building your business and helping your clients achieve the American dream of owning a new home.

Ray Rodriguez is vice president and regional mortgage sales manager for Metro New York at TD Bank, America's Most Convenient Bank®. He is responsible for training and developing the mortgage sales team and growing the market share within his region. Ray has more than 21 years of experience in the mortgage banking industry.

Have an idea for a guest blog for Construction Today? Contact alan.dorich@phoenixmediacorp.com or jim.harris@phoenixmediacorp.com.

By Theresa Cangialosi

Do you have a shortage of working hands available to help with your project? Ever wonder if the automation of aircraft, bulldozers, and excavators to program the early foundational work on construction sites could benefit your organization? In a recent article, Business Insider discussed how experts believe one-third of our jobs will be taken over by robots by 2025. For those who fear that robots may be taking over the world, or at least taking over our jobs, you may not deem the solution suggested in this blog post acceptable. However, the answer to the shortage of construction workers, deemed an “epidemic” by Jerry Howard, CEO of the National Association of Home Builders, may just be the drone. This aerial robot is capable of both remotely controlled flight (like a regular RC aircraft) and fully autonomous flight, controlled by sensors, GPS, and onboard computers. How specifically can drones help us on a construction site, you might ask?

According to a recent article in MIT Technology Review, many construction-equipment makers have begun to incorporate drones on construction sites to improve productivity. As the article discusses, drones are managing the site of a lavish new downtown stadium for the Sacramento Kings in California, speeding up the process and automatically flag slow progress. Drones can work on the site, completing tasks previously performed by workers, leaving more human hands and minds to focus on other aspects of construction and manage machines from the office. With drones, human operators gain the ability to monitor progress from a desk and can jump in and take control of a machine if and when necessary.

Not only can drones help complete the typical tasks human construction workers would perform, but they can improve workplace productivity by leaving more hands for other jobs and often complete the tasks of construction workers more efficiently. Measuring large construction sites by air is much easier, for example, considering two people could measure an entire site in a week, or drones could complete the task in one to two hours. Not to mention the fact that drones can remain small and agile, flying around with onboard high-res cameras and relaying progress shorts and aerial surveys to construction teams on the ground and send images to team members’ mobile phones – while humans cannot. While the idea of a drone-powered world is still entirely new to the majority of construction sites, drone technology is undoubtedly providing a competitive edge to companies who have successfully adopted it.

Companies that have adopted drones at their workplace use their equipment and resources more efficiently, are able to communicate better through accurate maps and data, and are given a highly quantitative means of measuring their progress against their schedule. As the technology becomes increasingly more affordable and prevalent in the workplace, the benefits are becoming harder to ignore. Do you think drones will eventually take over the construction world? How can your organization benefit from utilizing drones on the construction site?

Theresa Cangialosi is general manager and vice president of North America for the Bullitt Group

Have an idea for a guest blog for Construction Today? Contact alan.dorich@phoenixmediacorp.com or jim.harris@phoenixmediacorp.com.  

By Susan Finch

According to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, only 23 percent of workers with foot-related injuries were wearing safety shoes or boots. You can greatly reduce your chance of an injury by selecting proper boots and protective wear. But it has only been in the last century that we have safety procedures and government oversight in place to protect from hazardous working conditions and injuries. As safety boots evolved, so did the evolution of other boots. From hiking boots to mountaineering boots, shoes are now made with comfort, durability and safety in mind. Such boots are usually made out of suede or light fabrics for flexible use and support. Mid-weight boots are made from more synthetic materials that hold up against great wear and tear and give your ankle and bridge plenty of support. While most shoes and recreational boots don’t have official safety standards, work boots and protective gear generally fall under oversight of the Occupational Safety & Health Act.

The History of Workplace Safety

After the Civil War, the United States saw factories and manufacturing spread to produce new goods and usher in a new economic era. But without any safety standards or protective wear mandates, dangerous machinery and hazardous chemicals were the norm. Local state labor bureaus in the late 1900s reported horrific deaths and injuries that ran rampant in the workplace. America’s laborers and workers needed more protection in the workplace to improve their long-term health and immediate safety.

The Occupational Safety & Health Act

In 1970, Richard Nixon signed the Williams-Steiger Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Act to give the Federal Government oversight to set safety and health standards for most U.S. workers. Without the Act, we might still be seeing record high accidents and deaths in the workplace. The Act brought consistent standards and mandatory inspection measures to keep employers accountable in providing a safe and healthful workplace. The Act also covers the requirement for personal protective equipment like helmets, hard-toed shoes, goggles and eye protection depending on the industry and workplace conditions.

Safety Boots 101

Steel-toed boots were first seen at the end of World War II. Invented in Germany, they are now required in some jobs and must undergo OSHA compliance and licensing before being sold. Some steel-toed boots are durable enough to protect against a chainsaw accident. Like the name implies, steel-toed boots are reinforced by steel but can also be made from composite materials. Such boots are also puncture resistant and can prevent injury from some electrical and chemical hazards. Safety wear has also expanded past boots into steel-enforced shoes and other footwear.

Selecting Safety Footwear

Preventing workplace injuries isn’t as simple as picking up a pair of work boots. In part, safety boots are designed with specific recommendations and standards from the Occupational Safety & Health Act. If foot protection is required at a job, the employer should set up a safety protection program to help determine the best selection and fit. For example, construction workers should select footwear that protects against their protective hazards like compression and cuts.

Susan Finch is a freelance writer with a passion for travel and helping small businesses find their online voice through content marketing, blogging and beyond. She is an eclectic writer with more than 10 years of experience contributing to guidebooks, magazines, iPhone apps, online publications and more. She can be found at BySusanFinch.com.

Have an idea for a guest blog for Construction Today? Contact alan.dorich@phoenixmediacorp.com or jim.harris@phoenixmediacorp.com.
 

By Robert J. Hall

The construction industry is always changing and advancing. Think about how different construction looks today than it did 50, 20 or even 10 years ago. In fact, the only thing constant is change. The technological advances have made a big difference in how structures of all sizes are built. However, what can we expect over the next few years? Here are several ways that technology will continue to evolve the industry — in 2015 and for many years beyond.

  • Going Paperless: Reducing paper saves time and money. This trend is catching on in nearly every industry, but it is becoming very popular in the construction field. Reducing the use for paper clutter in the work environment can make it much easier for you as you are working on projects, small and large. The adaptation of tablets and smartphones has enabled nearly every task to be accomplished without the use of physical papers.
  • Drones: Drones are now used for surveying and other related tasks. This allows a crew to reach spots that may have otherwise been difficult or even impossible. While the upfront cost for a drone can be expensive, the money saved on surveying crews can be significant and make a big difference in a construction firm’s overall operations.
  • Additive Manufacturing:  Additive manufacturing, or 3-D printing, allows construction pieces to be “printed” on demand. This reduces the length of time to wait for factory creation by an enormous amount. 3-D printing is a very economical solution and eco-friendly, too — since there is often much less waste when products are created on demand than when products are created and sit in a warehouse until needed.
  • GPS Fleet Management: Large construction firms may have many trucks and other vehicles in the field. A GPS system can help you keep track of your fleet and know exactly what vehicle is at what jobsite. Today’s GPS management systems are easy to operate and provide data that helps you with all aspects of your business.
  • Additional Green Growth: Going green is trendy, there is no doubt about that. However, green technologies are influencing nearly every aspect of the construction industry. From fieldwork to deskwork, more and more green initiatives will come into play. If you can find ways to take advantage of the ecologically friendly initiatives today, you may save time and effort in the future.

The most exciting thing about construction is that this is only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the technology changes that are occurring. Who knows what home or building construction will look like a few years down the road? What is certain is that the road to get there will be very exciting. Those in the business should keep an open mind and be ready to embrace these technologies as they move from the fringes to the norm. After all, everything we now know about construction was once thought of as “just a trend.”  

Robert J. Hall is president of Track Your Truck, a leader in GPS vehicle tracking systems and software for small and midsized companies.        

Have an idea for a guest blog for Construction Today? Contact alan.dorich@phoenixmediacorp.com or jim.harris@phoenixmediacorp.com.

By David Nour 

Creative destruction sweeps away the old to be replaced by the new. A tsunami of creative new consumer devices is transforming our landscape with connectivity, responsiveness, and intelligence. The construction industry must take note, because the homes, offices and institutions we build will be directly affected by increased consumer expectations and abilities, elevated by this wave. This next generation of gadgets is teaching us how important it is to develop innovations that are part of an ecosystem. For the construction industry, the concern becomes how do you participate, contribute, become part of a technology innovator’s ecosystem, in a way that captures synergies for all members of that ecosystem? What’s amazing is how little these gadgets need YOU, the consumer.

Once installed, the ecosystem begins learning by seamlessly syncing data streams to help individuals achieve their desired outcomes at home, at work, and in transit. These innovations don’t need you to be anything but the buyer who takes them home. Whole industries will experience creative destruction as the “Internet of Things” ecosystem trend matures. Industries that were founded on demographic information will need to shift to behavioral science. At one time you could generalize that people roughly alike demographically would have roughly the same buying patterns.

The housing construction industry could count on a middle class family wanting to own their own 2,500-square-foot home. Now we’ve splintered into segments of one. Today my psychographics, my digital behaviors, everything I encounter that influences my thinking and call to action, can be very different from the middle class family next door. Maybe I want a 5,000-square-foot McMansion; maybe I want to rent. This shift can be extrapolated from the housing trade to every corner of the construction industry. You can no longer expect to market based on broad generalizations. As your prospective customer, I need you to provide that which helps me choose, decide, move to the next step. I don’t need you to sell to me, but to understand what I find credible, believable, digestible, in order to help me buy.

The construction industry needs to be part of the next generation of “smart” ecosystems, designed to take advantage of connectivity, responsiveness, and intelligence. What will the creative destruction ahead mean for your company? In what ecosystem will you find your niche?

Takeaways

1. Smart consumer product ecosystems affect the construction industry because they elevate consumer expectations and abilities.

2. Creative destruction will led to entire ecosystems of devices designed around insights into customer needs.

3.  As the “Internet of Things" trend matures, marketers in the construction industry must move from selling to helping customers buy.  

David Nour is an enterprise growth strategist and the thought leader on Relationship Economics® —the quantifiable value of business relationships. He is the author of several books including the best selling "Relationship Economics— Revised" (Wiley), "ConnectAbility" (McGraw-Hill), "The Entrepreneur’s Guide to Raising Capital" (Praeger) and "Return on Impact—Leadership Strategies for the age of Connected Relationships" (ASAE). Learn more at www.NourGroup.com. David may be reached at dnour@nourgroup.com.

Have an idea for a guest blog for Construction Today? Contact alan.dorich@phoenixmediacorp.com or jim.harris@phoenixmediacorp.com.    

By Andrew Armstrong

3-D printing is starting to revolutionize how things are designed and manufactured, as well as who can build and where things can be produced. And with the potential introduction of giant 3-D printers that can print concrete structures, small time manufacturing possibilities are no longer all 3-D printers are capable of; instead, these technological wonders may be capable of building things as large as homes in the near future.

The newest thing in 3-D technology may be what Behrokh Khoshnevis, a professor at the University of Southern California, has dubbed ‘contour crafting.’ Contour crafting is the concept of designing and creating three-dimensional objects from bottom to top, and bringing that technology to the realm of construction. Before long, Khroshnevis believes that he’ll be able to create entire structures out of pure concrete using 3-D printers. In other words, he may be able to 3-D print a concrete house. If the technology works, building a home would take less than 24 hours in the future.

There are others who are trying to master the art of concrete 3D printing, too; Skanska, a contractor, recently paired up with Foster + Partners to develop a “commercial concrete printing robot.” Richard Buswell, who has been working on the technology for the past eight years, has stated that while the technology is viable within the lab, it is the application of the technology in the real world on which work is being done.

The significance of the marriage between concrete-based construction and 3-D printing was aptly summarized on the Autodesk publication, Line//Shape//Space, which reads, “3D-printing technology is being integrated to produce complex building forms. This union has the potential to reduce the time required to produce such components by several orders of magnitude — from weeks to mere hours.” While Khoshnevis, Skanska and Foster + Partners plan to create a 3-D printer that will create structures out of concrete, a Chinese company recently — not to mention successfully —  printed an entire home’s structures using a 3D printer, and then assembled the home in mere hours.

To create their masterpiece, the Zhuoda Group printed six different modules, ranging from a bathroom to a bedroom, totaling 200 square meters. The house was then assembled in three hours (as a note, the actual printing of modules took approximately 10 days). The cost of building the home was priced at between $400 and $480 per square meter, bringing the total expense of printing and assembling to roughly $81,000 to $96,000. The home was created from materials that were sourced from agricultural and industrial waste, but no more specific information about the materials has been given out. For now, 3-D printing using concrete materials/filament, and building homes and structures using 3-D printing, is not commercially viable. However, it’s not unlikely that with more advancements in relevant technology, 3-D printing could become an integral part of the construction process. If not used to construct homes entirely, it’s safe to say that 3-D printing will, at the very least, be used to create building components or tools.

Andrew Armstrong is a technology enthusiast, business owner, and digital marketing strategist based in the San Francisco Bay Area. A graduate of UC Berkeley in 2003, Andrew enjoys attending Cal Football games with his wife, experimenting with new technology, and chasing around his toddler son. Follow him on Twitter.

Have an idea for a guest blog for Construction Today? Contact alan.dorich@phoenixmediacorp.com or jim.harris@phoenixmediacorp.com.

 

By Dr. Perry Daneshgari & Dr. Heather Moore

You order and buy your entertainment, clothing, office supplies, home goods and many other products and services from Amazon and Walmart. Very soon, you’ll be able to order your houses, commercial buildings, roads, bridges, schools and other structures from them too. Not unlike placing an online order for a car, you will go to an online or boutique store in the mall, enter your specifications or draw your dream home or school, agree on the price, and send away your order. That order will go to an e-shop, which will transfer your specifications to a 3D BIM model.

The full scale model, build simulation and work packages will be created and sent to prefabrication Construction Mega Centers (CMC). CMCs may be located in Turkey, China or in the United States. They’ll create subassemblies where all the parts for your specific structure - including, fixtures, bathtubs, kitchen, bathrooms, etc. have been delivered there by the suppliers and manufactures. The subcontractors will come to the CMC or receive the subassemblies on the site and start assembling your building. This all will be done within a few days and at a fraction of the normal cost. Possibly 10 percent of what it costs today. Y

ou may say, “no way." But here are a few examples. This video shows a Chinese hotel that was built in six days that is soundproof and thermal insulated and able to withstand a magnitude 9 earthquake. The Chinese sustainable building company, Broad Group, has achieved another seemingly impossible feat - building a 30-story tall hotel in 360 hours. Building a comparable building here at home would have taken 9 to 12 months or 18 to 24 months, respectively.

We may not think it is possible now; just like we didn’t take the SMED (Single Minute Exchange of Die) seriously back in 1975. SMED was invented by Toyota’s Production System, which took a typical die exchange time form two weeks down to few minutes and changed the history of manufacturing. The fact that the production site and assembly site are separated is already introducing many opportunities for reducing the time and cost of buildings.

For example, the entire facade of Barclays Center in New York was designed using  3-D modeling program. The same software also is used in design and development of Boeing commercial airplanes, as well as many automobile producers across the globe. The façade subassemblies were manufactured in a yard by the architect company responsible for the design, matched to the site with laser scanning and assembled at its current location in fraction of the time. The fact that the current paradigm of building structures is changing and they can be built, preassembled and put in place in separate locations already is verifying that the historical construction model of stick-build is behind us.

The Chinese already have the capability to build our domestic U.S. buildings in segments and to order, put them on a ship and do the final assembly in downtown San Diego or New York City. If you don’t believe this, look up the new Bay-Bridge in San Francisco. The Bridge was designed in America, built and preassembled in China, and put in place in San Francisco. You know who taught them all this and proved the concept?  It was the Kaiser Ship Building Facilities in San Francisco, which reduced the time of building liberty ships from nine months to four days - and eventually to one day. They did all that without modeling and computers, back then. The cost of shelter has to come down to match other progresses of the human race in productivity and this is just the beginning.

Dr. Perry Daneshgari is the President & CEO of MCA Inc., a management innovation company. He can be reached at perry@mca.net Dr. Heather Moore is MCA Inc.’s Vice President of Operations and she can be reached at hmoore@mca.net. Have an idea for a guest blog for Construction Today? Contact alan.dorich@phoenixmediacorp.com or jim.harris@phoenixmediacorp.com.

Current Issue

Check out our latest edition!

 

alan blog ct

Contact Us

Construction Today Magazine
150 N. Michigan Ave., Suite 900
Chicago, IL 60601

  312.676.1100
  312.676.1101

Click here for a full list of contacts.

Latest Edition

Spread The Love

Back To Top